It seems the more the Spirit moves in a church, the more the people in the congregation get sick. Spiritual warfare? Possibly. If it is, I can’t help but think we are making it easy for the devil. We aren’t taking care of ourselves. We don’t treat our bodies like they belong to God. We still indulge our desires to comfort ourselves with food or inactivity. As we suffer from physical pain, are we not making it easier for the devil to drag us down? Are we causing God to go to plan B because our body is out of commission?
We have an obligation to take care of ourselves. The body has to be able when the Spirit is willing. Find a support system. Have someone hold you accountable. And most of all, pray.
Thursday, February 18, 2010
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com
(NaturalNews) It’s being called the largest research fraud in medical history. Dr. Scott Reuben, a former member of Pfizer’s speakers’ bureau, has agreed to plead guilty to faking dozens of research studies that were published in medical journals.
Now being reported across the mainstream media is the fact that Dr. Reuben accepted a $75,000 grant from Pfizer to study Celebrex in 2005. His research, which was published in a medical journal, has since been quoted by hundreds of other doctors and researchers as “proof” that Celebrex helped reduce pain during post-surgical recovery. There’s only one problem with all this: No patients were ever enrolled in the study!
Dr. Scott Reuben, it turns out, faked the entire study and got it published anyway.
It wasn’t the first study faked by Dr. Reuben: He also faked study data on Bextra and Vioxx drugs, reports the Wall Street Journal.
As a result of Dr. Reuben’s faked studies, the peer-reviewed medical journal Anesthesia & Analgesia was forced to retract 10 “scientific” papers authored by Reuben. The Day of London reports that 21 articles written by Dr. Reuben that appear in medical journals have apparently been fabricated, too, and must be retracted.
After being caught fabricating research for Big Pharma, Dr. Reuben has reportedly signed a plea agreement that will require him to return $420,000 that he received from drug companies. He also faces up to a 10-year prison sentence and a $250,000 fine.
He was also fired from his job at the Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass. after an internal audit there found that Dr. Reuben had been faking research data for 13 years. (http://www.theday.com/article/20100…)
Business as usual in Big Pharma
What’s notable about this story is not the fact that a medical researcher faked clinical trials for the pharmaceutical industry. It’s not the fact that so-called “scientific” medical journals published his fabricated studies. It’s not even the fact that the drug companies paid this quack close to half a million dollars while he kept on pumping out fabricated research.
The real story here is that this is business as usual in the pharmaceutical industry.
Dr. Reuben’s actions really aren’t that extraordinary. Drug companies bribe researchers and doctors as a routine matter. Medical journals routinely publish false, fraudulent studies. FDA panel members regularly rely on falsified research in making their drug approval decisions, and the mainstream media regularly quotes falsified research in reporting the news.
Fraudulent research, in other words, is widespread in modern medicine. The pharmaceutical industry couldn’t operate without it, actually. It is falsified research that gives the industry its best marketing claims and strongest FDA approvals. Quacks like Dr Scott Reuben are an important part of the pharmaceutical profit machine because without falsified research, bribery and corruption, the industry would have very little research at all.
Pay special attention to the fact that the Anesthesia & Analgesia medical journal gladly published Dr. Reuben’s faked studies even though this journal claims to be a “scientific” medical journal based on peer review. Funny, isn’t it, how such a scientific medical journal gladly publishes fraudulent research with data that was simply invented by the study author. Perhaps these medical journals should be moved out of the non-fiction section of university libraries and placed under science fiction.
Remember, too, that all the proponents of pharmaceuticals, vaccines and mammograms ignorantly claim that their conventional medicine is all based on “good science.” It’s all scientific and trustworthy, they claim, while accusing alternative medicine of being “woo woo” wishful thinking and non-scientific hype. Perhaps they should have a quick look in the mirror and realize it is their own system of quack medicine that’s based largely on fraudulent research, bribery and corruption.
You just have to laugh, actually, when you hear pushers of vaccines and pharmaceuticals claim their medicine is “scientific” while natural medicine is “unproven.” Sure it’s scientific — about as scientific as the storyline in a Scooby Doo cartoon, or as credible as the medical license of a six-year-old kid who just received a “let’s play doctor” gift set for Christmas. Many pharmaceutical researchers would have better careers as writers of fiction novels rather than scientific papers.
For all those people who ignorantly claim that modern pharmaceutical science is based on “scientific evidence,” just give them these three words: Doctor Scott Reuben.
Drug companies support fraudulent research
Don’t forget that the drug companies openly supported Dr. Scott Reuben’s research. They paid him, in fact, to keep on fabricating studies.
The drug companies claim to be innocent in all this, but behind the scenes they had to have known what was going on. Dr. Reuben’s research was just too consistently favorable to drug company interests to be scientifically legitimate. If a drug company wanted to “prove” that their drug was good for some new application, all they had to do was ask Dr. Reuben to come up with the research (wink wink). “Here’s another fifty thousand dollars to study whether our drug is good for post-surgical pain (wink).”
And before long, Dr. Reuben would magically materialize a brand new study that just happened to “prove” exactly what the sponsoring drug company wanted to prove. Advocates of western medicine claim they don’t believe in magic, but when it comes to clinical trials, they actually do: All the results they wish to see just magically appear as long as the right researcher gets paid to materialize the results out of thin air, much like waving a magician’s wand and chanting, “Abra cadabra… let there be RESEARCH DATA!”
Shazam! The research data materializes just like that. It all gets written up into a “scientific” paper that also magically gets published in medical journals that fail to ask a single question that might exposed the research fraud.
I guess these people believe in magic after all, huh? Where science is lacking, a little “research magic” conveniently fills the void.
The whole system makes a mockery of real science. It is a system operated by criminals who fabricate whatever “scientific evidence” they need in order to get published in medical journals and win FDA approval for drugs that they fully realize are killing people.
What is “Evidence-Based Medicine?”
The fact that a researcher like Dr. Reuben could so successfully fabricate fraudulent study data, then get it published in peer-reviewed science journals, and get away with it for 13 years sheds all kinds of new light on what’s really behind “evidence-based medicine.”
The recipe for evidence-based medicine is quite simple: Fabricate the evidence! Get it published in any mainstream medical journal. Then you can quote the fabricated evidence as “fact!”
When pushers of pharmaceuticals and vaccines resort to quoting “evidence-based medicine” as their defense, keep in mind that much of their so-called evidence has been entirely fabricated. When they claim their branch of toxic chemical medicine is based on “real science,” what they really mean is that it’s based on fraudulent science but they’ve all secretly agreed to call it “real science.” When they claim to have “scientific facts” supporting their position, what they really mean is that those “facts” were fabricated by criminal researchers being paid bribes by the drug companies.
“Evidence-based medicine,” it turns out, hardly exists anymore. And even if it does, how do you know which studies are real vs. which ones were fabricated? If a trusted, well-paid researcher can get his falsified papers published for 13 years in top-notch science journals — without getting caught by his peers — then what does that say about the credibility of the entire peer-review science paper publishing process?
Here’s what is says: “Scientific medicine” is a total fraud.
And this fraud isn’t limited to Dr Scott Reuben, either. Remember: he engaged in routine research fraud for 13 years before being caught. There are probably thousands of other scientists engaged in similar research fraud right now who haven’t yet been caught in the act. Their fraudulent research papers have no doubt already been published in “scientific” medical journals. They’ve been quoted in the popular press. They’ve been relied on by FDA decision makers to approve drugs as “safe and effective” for widespread use.
And yet underneath all this, there’s nothing more than fraud and quackery. Sure, there may be some legitimate studies mixed in with all the fraud, but how can we tell the difference?
How are we to trust this system that claims to have a monopoly on scientific truth but in reality is a front for outright scientific fraud?
Keep up the great work, Dr Reuben
Thank you, Dr Scott Reuben, for showing us the truth about the pharmaceutical industry, the research quackery, the laughable “scientific” journals and the bribery and corruption that characterizes the pharmaceutical industry today. You have done more to shed light on the true nature of the drug industry than a thousand articles on NaturalNews.com ever could.
Keep up the good work. After paying your fine and serving a little jail time, I’m sure your services will be in high demand at all the top drug companies that need yet more “scientific” studies to be fabricated and submitted to the medical journals.
You may be a dishonest, disgusting human being to most of the world, but you’re a huge asset to the pharmaceutical industry and they need you back! There are more studies that need to be fabricated soon; more false papers that need to be published and more dangerous drugs that need to receive FDA approval. Hurry!
Because if there’s one place that extreme dishonesty is richly rewarded, it’s in the pharmaceutical industry, where poisons are approved as medicines and fiction is published as the truth.
Sources for this story include: http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/
My biggest fear is gaining all the weight back after I leave the gym.
“By the time I stopped working out my appetite had increased immensely but I did not exercise at all. I’ve always been thin but I gained three to four kilos after I stopped my workout”
But I wanna look slim and I also want a good muscle tone. I am confused right now.
Some inspiring words:
“I find that when I’ve been going to the gym for a few weeks, I get almost ‘addicted’ to it. Energetic exercise gives a rush of endorphins following a session, and your body feels absolutely fantastic. You feel on top of the world, and pumped with energy.”
But…
“You need to incorporate fitness into your daily routine. It should be as mandatory as brushing your teeth and having bath even when you are on a break”
I am going to be confused for quite some time. I don’t know if I can commit to this gym thing.
Thought of the day!
“Follow effective action with quiet reflection. From the quiet reflection will come even more effective action.” – Peter Drücker
A peaceful day with a long walk in woods, dunes and beach to reflect on the week.
The path in the forest is the inspiration to continue on this path of self-discovery. Yes, there are obstacles in the way, but dealing with each and everyone the path is unfolding and opening up.
The quietness of the dunes with only the sound of grass moving in the wind has lead me to discover that stillness is not a bad thing. I am actually beginning to enjoy it. The mind needs its rest.
The rolling waves demonstrate that the energy is continuously moving and creating new things. No waves are alike. Relentlessly, they keep coming to achieve their purpose and so will I.
When purchasing stationary bicycles, you have two basic designs to select from. One style is the recumbent bike, which features a seat with a back and places the pedals more in front of you rather than below you. The other design is made more like the traditional bicycle. If you are looking for a stationary bicycle that is designed more like a traditional bicycle, you might want to consider the LifeCore Fitness 900UB Upright Bike.
The LifeCore Fitness 900UB Upright Bike offers a very lightweight and compact design, weighing only 88 pounds and being 41 inches long and 24 inches wide. It also features a walk-thru design, which makes it easy to use in nearly any space. It does have a weight capacity of 300 pounds, however, which means this upright bike might not be the right choice if you are particularly heavy. In addition, despite its adjustable seat and handlebars, it might not be high enough if you are a very tall person.
The display screen, which utilizes LCD technology, provides very sharp and easy to read images. Here, you can monitor your heart rate with the help of the contact heart rate sensors as well as read more about the one of twelve preset programs you have selected. With so many programs to choose from, people of nearly every ability level can find the best one for their needs. The display also provides other helpful information, such as the current time and temperature.
In addition to its compact design, the LifeCore Fitness 900UB Upright Bike is also quite durable. Made with a heavy-duty aluminum frame and scratch resistant coating, it also comes with a five-year warranty when being used for residential purposes and a two year warranty when being used for light commercial purposes.
If you have back problems or are otherwise uncomfortable when riding on a traditional bicycle, you might be better suited with a stationary recumbent bicycle. Otherwise, the LifeCore Fitness 900UB Upright Bike is a good choice for most people.
Yay! The scales were nicer to me, but after all the exercise I’ve done and the pain that is currently riddling my body as a result, so they should be!
I bought a dress from ebay that said it was a size 8-10, really?? The fact I can’t breathe in it means I’m either fatter than I thought or it’s not the right size. Either way I’d like to find a way to be able to breathe in it by Sunday. Whilst the scales are better, I sincerely doubt this is going to happen.
In the quest for fitting into the dress, I went to body attack this morning. There is something wrong with having a duracell bunny of an instructor screaming at me at 6.30am. I couldn’t truly get into it, it was just too much. If it works though, I’ll be eating my words (and sweaty top).
I’m not quite so confident about the scales tomorrow, but I’m ever hopeful.
My biggest fear is gaining all the weight back after I leave the gym.